Hospital Triage
Hospital A (UK framework) and Hospital B (UAE framework) both approve AI-assisted triage. Same intent. Different governance foundations. Are they comparable?
Decifact checks whether two independently governed decisions were ever on the same basis to begin with — before anything depends on it.
Both hospitals followed their own governance process. Here's what happens when their decisions need to work together:
The hospitals are not necessarily disagreeing.
Under the current Phase 1 implementation, Decifact checks whether the compared records share the governance reference used as the comparison-basis proxy.
If that proxy does not match, the result is FORMALLY_INCOMPARABLE.
Hospital A (UK framework) and Hospital B (UAE framework) both approve AI-assisted triage. Same intent. Different governance foundations. Are they comparable?
Agriculture Ministry and Finance Ministry both approve the same AI system. Each approval is internally valid. Can they be placed on the same comparison basis?
Agent A produces: BUY NVDA
Agent B produces: SELL NVDA
Both operating under valid policies. Is this a disagreement — or an incomparability?
A comparison basis is detected under the current implementation, and the compared governance conditions are equivalent within the declared scope.
A comparison basis is detected under the current implementation, but the compared governance conditions or determinations differ within the declared scope.
This is a genuine difference, not merely a missing basis.
No shared comparison basis detected under the current Phase 1 policy_reference-equality proxy.
Not a disagreement. A structural finding — not proof that no broader comparison or translation mechanism could establish one.
FORMALLY_INCOMPARABLE is not an error. It is a first-class governance result.
Building multi-agent systems, cross-domain governance, or decision verification infrastructure?
If what you saw on this page maps to a problem you're working on — let's talk.
xsa52000@gmail.com